|
Post by pavel on Jan 13, 2016 20:03:35 GMT -6
WASHINGTON (AP) — A major abortion-rights group on Wednesday criticized House Minority Leader Nancy Pelosi over what it called "disappointing and ill-advised" remarks, the second public rift in a year with a lawmaker such organizations have long considered one of their staunchest congressional allies. In an interview published Wednesday in which the California Democrat defended a woman's right to abortion, Pelosi said, "I don't believe in abortion on demand." The interview appeared in Roll Call, which covers Congress. NARAL Pro-Choice America said in a written statement that with abortion rights under attack by lawmakers, advocates need their supporters "to speak with a clear and strong voice" and should not use "twisted GOP talking points." "We don't know women who demand abortion," said the statement by Sasha Bruce, a NARAL senior vice president. Bruce added, "We do know women who make thoughtful decisions about how and if they want to start a family, and who need access to all reproductive-health care services." Read more: hosted2.ap.org/NMSAN/22cc57cfcadf46539fed78000445f467/Article_2016-01-13-US--Pelosi-Abortion%20Dispute/id-d5bb838e4eee4af5b3a232b087ec8910
|
|
|
Post by nobody on Jan 17, 2016 14:16:16 GMT -6
So much confused thinking and talking about abortion. This is an example.
When Pelosi said "I don't believe in abortion on demand," was she expressing her personal preference as to herself? Or her belief as to the morality of the choice? Or was she speaking in favor of making abortion on demand illegal? Do we know?
The Republicans -- most of them -- want to force their moral and personal preferences on others as a matter of law. Democrats -- most of them -- do not but are willing to leave it up to the conscience and preference of the women involved in the decision.
Many staunch Democrats do not "believe in abortion" but are not willing to prohibit abortion as a matter of law.
|
|
|
Post by liberal on Jan 18, 2016 21:43:53 GMT -6
I cant believe she said that. She should know better
|
|
|
Post by nobody on Jan 19, 2016 7:34:45 GMT -6
Pelosi is 75, born, raised, and educated Catholic, is rich enough and safe enough in her house seat to lower her filters.
Clinton [Bill] said that "abortion should be cheap, available, and rare." Or something close to that, haven't Googled it.
Certain Republicans like to cast Democrats as baby-killers. [Congressman Neugebauer of my district said "Baby-killer!" audibly during an Obama speech to Congress.] Which is incorrect in two ways -- (1) that an embryo or fetus is a baby, and (2) that Democrats want to encourage abortion. [You might also add that the Bible says nothing about abortion, but Exodus 21:22 inplies that a fetus is a property right of the father. But those who claim to think the Bible is the literal word of God do a complicated dance to interpret that passage.]
The Democratic platform is to support a pregnant woman's right to choose, not to support abortion in itself. The prevailing evangelical Republican way is, if you do not approve of something, to make it illegal. While Democrats, most of them, are content to leave abortion to private conscience while keeping open the avenue of choice. Within the legal limits of Roe v. Wade, of course.
Now me, I'm an eco-extremist. I support NPG and think the government should encourage abortion and restrict immigration so as to reduce our population to under 200 million. I wouldn't be winning any elections anywhere.
|
|