|
Post by blue808 on Jun 17, 2016 13:28:56 GMT -6
I found this article interesting... the comments not so much.. A Professional Poker Player Analyzes Bernie Sanders’ Primary Tactics link(snip) As Democrats and leftists debate whether Sanders should stay in the race for the Democratic nomination, a professional poker player explains why the candidate is playing his weak hand well—to the benefit of his campaign, his values and the Democratic Party. “As a former professional poker player, I approach decision-making from a different perspective” than most pundits, writes Peter Alson, author of “Confessions of an Ivy League Bookie,” at Observer. “For today’s players, advanced strategy is predicated on extracting maximum value from one’s holdings, no matter the strength, using position and leverage to one’s advantage.” Approaching their task as game theorists, modern players calculate their chances and devise their strategies using the cards they hold. “So let’s play Bernie’s cards. His holdings are weaker than Hillary’s; he trails in delegates, superdelegates and the popular vote. His path to the nomination at this point is narrower than a militiaman’s view on gun laws. If he refuses to drop out of the race, and it results in a contested convention, what is his expected net gain versus what he might lose?” (end) note: I'm not a poker player at all, but I found the author's perspective interesting and illuminating... note to mod: the preview button doesn't work..
|
|
|
Post by Logan on Jun 18, 2016 16:02:45 GMT -6
I found this article interesting... the comments not so much.. A Professional Poker Player Analyzes Bernie Sanders’ Primary Tactics link(snip) As Democrats and leftists debate whether Sanders should stay in the race for the Democratic nomination, a professional poker player explains why the candidate is playing his weak hand well—to the benefit of his campaign, his values and the Democratic Party. “As a former professional poker player, I approach decision-making from a different perspective” than most pundits, writes Peter Alson, author of “Confessions of an Ivy League Bookie,” at Observer. “For today’s players, advanced strategy is predicated on extracting maximum value from one’s holdings, no matter the strength, using position and leverage to one’s advantage.” Approaching their task as game theorists, modern players calculate their chances and devise their strategies using the cards they hold. “So let’s play Bernie’s cards. His holdings are weaker than Hillary’s; he trails in delegates, superdelegates and the popular vote. His path to the nomination at this point is narrower than a militiaman’s view on gun laws. If he refuses to drop out of the race, and it results in a contested convention, what is his expected net gain versus what he might lose?” (end) note: I'm not a poker player at all, but I found the author's perspective interesting and illuminating... note to mod: the preview button doesn't work.. Hello, the default mode for users is the preview mode wysiwyg, while the BBCode tab allows users to view the HTML tags that mark up the text. While the poker analogy is interesting, it does appear that Bernie's influenced has waned since the New York primary. If he had cut some deals at the point then he would have been far likelier to get parts of his agenda inserted into the platform. When I listened to his speech on Thursday I paid more attention to the tone rather than concentrating on the actual words of his speech since it was the stump speech he has given over the past year and I found the tone to be both bitter and sounding more like someone who was in a hostage situation. I support some of the ideas that Sanders has championed since I believe in many socialist tenets, but I felt like Bernie was jeopardizing his legacy and the progressive movement with that speech. There are other progressive leaders that will be there to take up the banner in local, state and national elections in the future so I hope that he can find a way to be a bit more conciliatory if he speaks in public again and at the national convention. I think that most of the goals are laudable; however, they don't necessarily coincide with the Democratic Party and have more in common with the Green Party instead.
|
|